Riverfront Rights Group Will Appeal Decision in Case with City of Memphis and Brooks Museum
In the case to protect the public promenade against unlawful development and stripping away its intended use, Friends for our Riverfront vowed to appeal the Chancery Court’s dismissal of the case. The court sided against the public-interest group on a procedural technicality without any ruling on the merits of the case in response to the City of Memphis and the Brooks Museum’s motion to dismiss.
“We’re planning to appeal this technicality so that the facts of this case can play out in a court of law.” said Virginia McLean, Friends for our Riverfront President. “Powerful and influential organizations are spending a great deal of time (and taxpayer money) trying to keep the facts of this case out of the public eye, but we vow to move forward in the interest of law-abiding Memphians.”
Why is this important to Memphians and taxpayers?
The City of Memphis decided to give a private museum precious riverfront property that is not owned by the city. The city does not have the title to the land, and therefore, can not give it away. The land is designated in perpetuity to be a free, open, public riverfront for everyone’s use as a gathering point overlooking the Mississippi River.
The massive project was ushered through at great expense to the taxpayer without ample public input, sharing legal and other vital public information, much less offering alternatives, or canvassing for public input. The project footprint continues to expand, as does the expense, while obstructing and interfering with a public asset that has been in place since 1819.
Our government, the City of Memphis, should not be in the business of simply taking any land that is not owned by the city regardless of the intended use. The stewards of the property support development downtown that’s lawful.








